'All morality, like politics, is local'

I’ve thought and written a lot about being involved in my community of Hillsdale.

So I was curious what others would write about community as I settled into the chapter of readings devoted to the topic of “Building Local Community” in my “Sense of Place” course book anthology.

The “group-guided” course is offered by the Northwest Earth Institute and is centered around discussion of shared, stimulating readings.

All the readings were excellent in this chapter, but one essay by the clinical psychologist Mary Pipher provided me with new insights into community.

“Home,” Pipher writes, “doesn’t have to be where you were born or grew up....it does have to be a real place that you have committed to over time. I has to be a place where you have friends and know the names of many people you meet....It’s where when you sit down to talk, you don’t have to discuss Tom Hanks or Benecio del Toro. You have real people in common.”

That’s what Hillsdale, a neighborhood in Portland, Oregon, has become for me, and I’ve lived here “only” 20 years.

Pipher continues, “Communities are about accountability, about what we can and should do for each other. People who live together have something that is fragile and easily destroyed by a lack of civility. Behavior matters. Protocol is important. Relationships are not disposable. People are careful what they say in real communities because they will live with their words until the day they die.”

Because of this need for community civility, Pipher adds, “We behave better with people and places we will see again and again.”

Bad behavior, like “road rage” and war, happens between strangers who will not meet again.

And so Pipher says, “All morality, like politics, is local.”

A lot of the connection between neighbors is sharing our stories and our space, she notes. What is our shared history? What are our civic events and celebrations? What are our public spaces — trails and parks, plazas and markets ?

Pipher writes, “Those communal places are needed now more than ever.”

And increasingly, with the lure of “virtual worlds” and fabricated "television" neighbors, we have to consciously make our communities and commit to them.

Yodeling

Today’s trenchant question asks whether words interfere with our understanding of where we are — with our sense of place?

The query is prompted by the group-guided course I’m taking through the Northwest Earth Institute. Its title, appropriately enough, is “A Sense of Place.” The eight-session course with its carefully selected readings invites us, its ten enrollees, to become intimate with where we live.

A recent required reading urged us to stay put. To resist the restlessness that afflicts so many Americans.

Another assigned article called on us to recognize, explore and celebrate our bioregion, a place that defies and transcends political boundaries.

The course also asks us to consider the slippery concept of ownership of place. Do we own the land? As we know, Native Americans found the whole idea alien, literally beyond comprehension. The European settlers and their ancestors have based much of the economy, and many of our burdens, on private ownership of land. The notion defines our values, our legal system and our lives.

Native peoples would no doubt be amused that much of our “ownership” is now “underwater,” submerged in debt accumulated in a frenzy of consumption and greed.

I’ve concluded that so much of what determines our conception, and misconception, of where we live has to do with names. “Where are you from?” I’m asked in my travels. “Portland, Oregon,” I say without giving my answer much thought.

Do I know what I’m saying? Have I been honest? Or is this simply a cursory, but readily understandable shorthand for a foreigner?

My answer conjures up in the listener some media image of Portland. Bikes, coffee, bridges, rain, perhaps the iconic profile of Mount Hood on a clear day.

And what does my answer mean to me? Portland is a proper noun with a multitude of associations. I can’t begin to put into words all the things Portland means. Nor can my fellow Portlanders.

Limited by words and labels, is it possible to express our sense of place? The spirit of cedar and fir, of bird, beaver and coyote; the distant laughter of children; the pulse of days and seasons; the power that pushes daffodils through the soil at this time of year.

We are part of it all, but when we put names on the pieces, as I have just done, they become “other.” Naming is distancing, whether we like it or not.

If someone elsewhere in Portland asks me where I live, I say “Hillsdale,” which is my neighborhood. We Portlanders identify our places by named neighborhoods. If I told a German or a Kenyan I lived in Hillsdale, I’d rightly get the answer, “Where’s that?”

Where indeed? It is beyond words.

Swiss dairy families inhabited these hills and dales a century ago. They called it “Hillsdale” too, but it had no set boundaries. Nor did it have commuters, parking lots and Starbucks. It was both the same and a very different place in time.

Imagine one of those farm families returning to Hillsdale today. Where cows grazed, soccer teams dribble on Astroturf; where a machine shop stood there is now a Papa John’s fast-food pizzeria. The pig farms in the gully have been filled in and replaced by a four-lane highway and multi-unit apartments; The muddy tracks are paved. The pace of life has quickened. And where wood lots were there are now ranks of ranch houses built in the post-World War II boom years. The site of a windmill now is home to the Hillsdale county library.

What would our time-traveling family’s sense of this place, “their place,” be after witnessing what has happened?

What if we could be taken on a similar time journey to this place one hundred years hence? What would we find in 2110? And to what extent would we bear responsibility for it — for better or worse?

Perhaps the destiny of this place will be determined by events far, far away. By federal government fiat, by a terrorist’s bomb, by rapacious, polluting corporate interests. If we think our neighborhood is our place, we would do well to think again. We live in a much larger place, even as we inhabit this little one.

A memoir written by Margaret Graf, who lived here in Hillsdale 100 years ago, describes the red-tinged dusk of a sultry summer’s day. The hills then were a patchwork of dairies that served the little city at the bottom of the Tuality hills. Portland was a cluster of civilization hugging the Willamette River. And Hillsdale was country. The road connecting city and farmland was a washboard of dirt and rock and logs.

The days on the dairy began early and lasted deep into the afternoon and evening. But at dusk, Margaret wrote, a sound defined the place for her. It was a man-made sound but it carried no explicit meaning as it echoed across the hills and dales. It did not consist of words. It was the primordial sound a beast might make in celebration of life and place.

The sound she heard from the dairies was yodeling.

Half in jest, I suggested to my classmates that we might consider yodeling again in Hillsdale. Yodeling would take us beyond our word-defined world and into the spirit and joy of being here.

Hearing us warble and ululate in the dimming hours of the day, our time-traveling farm family would recognize instantly that all had not been lost.